A Hard Look at IT
IT has been traditionally been viewed
as either
vertically (focused on line of business or isolated industries) or horizontally
(focused on business processes or enabling technologies). With today’s
technology trends, a new paradigm has emerged, the old lines become blurred,
thus creating a systemic view that illuminates new business opportunities and
creative ways of solving problems.
IT
is no longer satisfied in being the Data Center Monitor, or the Endpoint
fixer. IT leaders are transforming their
enterprise into the engine of the vehicle of growth. They are modernizing the infrastructure while
delivering new approaches to delivering efficient tools, approaches, and
support to their customers. No longer working in a vacuum, the IT mindset
embraced the business model as the nucleic driver of their technology
decisions.
IT
architectures – have operated much like it is on fad diets – ever expanding and
contracting, e.g., Distributed systems and functions then dieting again collapsing
to centralized systems and silos. The
effective result is the only temporary, much like fad diets – you weight
eventually goes back to obese.
What
the mindset today has brought about is the question of whether this should
continue? Should IT continue the promises
of fad diets that result in the expansion / contraction of system delivery, or
stop and rethink what the end goal should be?
Rather
than solely focus on their own waist lines of function delivery and the best
way to operate – IT leaders are turn that on its head and changing the delivery
model to focus on processes and delivery outcomes. This breaks the cycle of self-focus, and
shifts its view on the deliverable – that is., efficiency and value, the best
bang for their buck.
The Net
Its traditional delivery models are tapping out when faced
with today’s innovation and changes. The
Re-Purposing removes the self-reliance/focus and lays out a roadmap for leaders
to overhaul its pursuits to align with the very business goals that if
professes to support.
What Does This Mean?
From the Top Down
- Erasing your charter/mission to align with the Company’s vision. There is a reason why CIOs don’t have the key to the executive wash room. No explanation needed.
- Budgeting for Company priorities – Outcome based budgeting, i.e., focusing on dynamic delivery models to support the every changing priorities of the business. Many older IT shops have a time-honored budget planning process that goes something like this: Business leaders make a list of “wants” and categorize them by priority and cost. These projects typically absorb most of its discretionary budget, with care and maintenance claiming the rest. This basic budget blueprint will be good for a year, until the planning process begins again.
- Infrastructure Business Model – Change to Automated tech stack – provide the foundation needed to support rapid development and deployment of flexible solutions that, in turn, enable innovation and growth. In specific, self service automation. Just because we don’t embrace the cloud wholeheartedly, doesn’t mean that we can’t learn from their processes. An important concept popularized by some cloud vendors. Through a web-based portal, users can access IT resources from a catalog of standardized service options. The automated system controls the provisioning process and enforces role-based access, approvals, and policy-based controls. This can help mitigate risk and accelerate the marshaling of resources. As one oft-repeated adage reminds us, “The efficiency of an IT process is inversely correlated to the number of unique humans it takes to accomplish it.”
- Reorganizing teams and breaking down silos: In many IT organizations, workers are organized in siloes by function or skillset. For example, network engineering is distinct from QA, which is different from system administration. Transforming this model begins by breaking down skillset silos and reorganizing IT workers into multi-skill, results-oriented teams. These teams focus not on a specific development step—say, early-stage design or requirements—but more holistically on delivering desired outcomes.
Objections from the Peanut Gallery
Now
we understand the nay-sayer’s position. By challenging assumptions and
transforming systems you are asking for an invitation to dysfunction. Technology will always be complex and require
architects and engineers to guide you through the weeds.
However,
as with everything, when new, technologies often seem opaque along with the possibilities
they offer. But as we have seen time and time again, yesterday’s disruptive
enigma quickly evolves into technology fluency.
Consider the smartphone, social media, etc. Children and grandparents alike now share a
common understanding and embraced the indoctrination of these tools in their
daily lives and for some wouldn’t dream of leaving the house without it.
The nay-sayer
would present that distributing tech across the business, you lose efficiency
that goes with having a centralized enterprise architecture.
Again,
we retort… smartphone… Just because your
data needs to be centralized, doesn’t mean technology does... Power should be
in the hands of those who need it – centralize when it brings value to the
business – not value (ease and convenience) to the technologists.
And
the last objection that would be heard by the nay-sayer’s - Breaking down
organizational silos sounds like a recipe for organizational chaos. IT
functions and teams are delineated for a reason.
The
issue of organizational siloes boils down to one question: Should IT remain a collection
of function-specific fiefdoms, or should you organize it around processes and
outcomes? By focusing on and organizing around outcomes, you are not
introducing disorder—you are simply reordering the IT organization so that it
can partner more effectively with the business, and maximize the value it
brings to the enterprise. This is particularly true with bottom-up investments focusing
on standardizing platforms, automation, and delivery.
___________________________________________
Source(s)
We would like to thank our sponsors, for without them - our fine content wouldn't be deliverable!
Source(s)
- https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/tech-trends.html
- https://www.accenture.com/t20180227T215953Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/next-gen-7/tech-vision-2018/pdf/Accenture-TechVision-2018-Tech-Trends-Report.pdf#zoom=50
- http://go.infotech.com/2018-CIO-Trend-Report-G?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=tech%20trends
- https://datafloq.com/read/the-top-7-technology-trends-for-2018/4085
So “Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more;”
____________________________________________________________
About Rick Ricker
An IT professional with over 23 years experience in Information Security, wireless broadband, network and Infrastructure design, development, and support.
For more information, contact Rick at (800) 399-6085 x502
About Rick Ricker



No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your input, your ideas, critiques, suggestions are always welcome...
- Wasabi Roll Staff